5 things common to Obama and Gandhi

Call it a premature infatuation or the fallings of an overwhelmed world citizen, but the more I listen to Barack Obama the more I admire him and the more I would want to listen to him. He may be taking a tough stand against outsourcing, but I still admire him for the values that he stands for. Though I did not have the fortune to listen to such numerous videos of Mahatma Gandhi, whenever I listen to Obama, I see a clear reflection of Gandhi's thoughts and values. So here goes the list.

1. World Peace

Obama talks of re-opening American consulates that have been shut, re-enter into a dialogue with all the enemy nations and launching a strong diplomacy to ensure that America contributes positively to the world peace. And if Gandhi can be summarised in any way, it would be world peace.

2. Equity
Fighting for the poor, at times he echoes the Indian Left. His speeches clearly indicate that he wants to achieve a sort of equity between the haves and the have nots. And this is not just about money. Its about Education, Healthcare and more. He wants to achieve a parity between the rich and the poor. Mahatma had always insisted that India lies in its villages and number one priority of us all Indians should be to uplift the poor.

3. Swadeshi ( Economic Independence)

India may not like this stuff, but Obama is all set to restore the virtues of an economically independent nation. Fifty years ago, Gandhi stressed the same thing and epitomised it by weaving his own clothes. Obama is not a globalisation-hater. But he is all set to restore the economic self-respect of America.

4. Unity

Obama is a UNIFYING entity. He brings the whites and the blacks together. This unity is not just a rhetoric, but a sincere attempt. While Gandhi stressed on unity to fight away the British, Obama is doing it to bring a divided nation together for its own survival and identity.

5. Non-Violence

Obama clearly stands for non-violence. His campaign has not only sought to end violence in Iraq but also within the country. Infact Gandhi can be singularly marked for adhering to the principles of non-violence.

One may say that he only talks, but his talks are an indication of change that he wants to bring about. Infact all the leaders had to talk their way up before putting into practice what they talked about. As I listen more to him, the more I am convinced that he is embracing Indian values in the areas of education, economy and religion.

Two worlds in One world

I see two worlds within the same world. The other world is not occupied by aliens but by us human beings (sorry to disappoint Krrish fans). They are not developed and underdeveloped, but they are different in the way they communicate and perceive the outside world. And they have been created within our own life times and the space we live.

No more guessing, I am talking of people in the fast growing cities and those in the countryside. People in the cities experience fast life, are usually very well informed, time is sacrosanct, have little patience, are well connected via net. The people in the upcountry experience things that are very similar but the degree of intensity is highly diluted. People are well informed but they dont seek it as a matter of urgency. 24 hours news is still an icing on the cake and the morning newspaper is anyway there for them. Most of them don't even have email IDs and even though they are connected through mobiles, emails are still a non-essential thing except for the few. One world has speed, fast life, information at the finger tips and more than imaginable impatience. The other world has its own pace and enough patience to stand in the que.

Then there are differences, you would just wish, were not there. The POLLUTION and CRIME!! One is clean and only getting a bit dusty and the other is already thick black. The one is still safe and the other a preferred destination for criminals.

I remember seeing an English movie long back, dont remember the name now. The protagonist of the movie is a pregnant lady reporter who often covers crime and other stuffs for a reputed publication. The baby in her womb often keeps talking to this reporter mother. After sometime, the baby starts complaining to the mother that the world is cruel, that its full of pollution, it has indifference and love is dyeing. And it makes a strange wish - "I DON'T WANT TO ENTER THIS WORLD, I AM SAFE INSIDE". The mother is disturbed and seeks to bring some normalcy to life. The baby appears to respond to a small boy in her apartment. The mother engages this little boy to talk to the baby inside. The boy opens his entire world of innocence and little pleasures to this baby. Slowly but surely, the baby starts loving the world. I don't remember the end.

My academic curiosity : Why are Mumbai and Bangalore so different from Kolhapur or Hubli? Why are the big cities getting so cruel, dangerous and indifferent by the day? Is it time we introduce people to the virtues of smaller worlds? The B city? The C city? To the innocence and pleasures of a small kid?

Can we have some Good News please !!

Reading newspaper in the morning gives heartaches. Switch to a news channel and you see the blood splashed everywhere. Add to that an infinite number of crime stories and diaries making the life a living hell. Breaking news almost breaks your heart and a bit of head too. Eventhough you may be miles away from the place of crime, you are made to feel and suffer the pains of everybody involved. Some may say this is necessary and even justify it as the very purpose of showing it. But a newspaper and a channel full of this content more often wears down heavily on the human mind, which then for some strange reason refuses to think positively. Its not that good things are not happening at all. Infact they are much more and better than these. But a sad news ends up consuming the entire space in the media which incidentally finds pleasure in sensationalising the content. Competition has forced media to present the news in as grotesque a manner as possible.

No wonder the Indians often talk cynically. They fail to see the brighter side simply because they are not exposed to it. The young India is such a gutless and courageless one. Give them computers, they will write scores of softwares. Hand them a condom and they will knock every door on earth to sell it. But ask them to step into politics, manage hypocrisy and contradictions, govern and lead: the answer is a simple no. It has become such a fashion from students to film stars to keep complaining about dirty politics and say "Oh! politics is not for me, I cant lie you know and blah blah blah".

The question is, can't we have enough good things to say and show? So many encouraging developments take place in the society every minute that deserve our attention. Media can pro-actively search and bring it to the audience. Even in some of the most troubled places of earth, the front page is consumed by such encouraging headlines and the bomb blasts etc which have become a sort of routine for the citizens, get published in some obscure corner of the paper. Can the media in India also do such things. Can they resolve to showcase atleast one very encouraging and positive development each morning. With the power that they command today, they can make an entire generation embrace challenges. And ofcourse it would make the life a lot more pleasant and livable.

I recently found a site that is dedicated to spreading the good news all the time. You will definitely be surprised to see http://goodnewsindia.com/, a site that talks of positive action, steely endeavour and quiet triumphs and news that is hidden below the sevaral layers of the mainstream media. "Lead India" was yet another initiative that came as a relief from a reputed publication like Times of India.

Are the media giants listening?